Duelfer report: Political ammunition

The recent disclosure by the Bush administration's own investigative team that Saddam Hussein had not possessed weapons of mass destruction for more than a decade, shattered the US president's principal justification for invading Iraq.

    Iraq intelligence findings have made Bush politically vulnerable

    But political analysts say whether such revelations will alter the course of the hotly contested presidential race, depends on Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry's ability to convince voters

    that the report confirms Iraq never presented an imminent threat to US national security.

    "It can't help Bush, but whether it will hurt him dramatically depends on whether the Democrats can make the public understand just how little basis

    there was, in retrospect, for fearing Saddam Hussein at the start of the war," Gideon Rose, managing editor of Foreign Affairs magazine, said.

    While most analysts in Washington view the report as a political blow to the administration, its impact on the election will likely be defined by other

    events in Iraq over the next several weeks, according to Norman Ornstein, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative

    thinktank.

    Big burden

    "If we get a continuing cascade of bad news out of Iraq, it will be one of a number of contributing factors making it a big burden for Bush," Ornstein

    said.

    The findings, presented by Charles Duelfer, the chief US weapons inspector in Iraq, said whatever chemical and biological weapons Saddam

    possessed were destroyed after the first Gulf War and that years of international sanctions had crippled his attempts to develop nuclear technology.

    Bad news out of Iraq could yet
    influence electorate's choice

    "I still do not expect that militarily significant WMD stockpiles are cached in Iraq," Duelfer said recently in testimony before the Senate Armed

    Services Committee.

    Unlike many partisan statements rebutting the administration's pre-war intelligence on Iraqi weapons programs, Duelfer's findings cannot be written

    off as the political rhetoric of an anti-Bush Democrat.

    The report was delivered during the same week that Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Bremer, who presided over the now defunct

    Coalition Provisional Authority, made public statements deemed politically harmful to the president.

    Rumsfeld told the Council on Foreign Relations that he had seen no strong evidence of a connection between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, while

    Bremer said the administration had not put enough troops on the ground in Iraq following the end of major combat operations. Both men have since

    backed off those comments.

    Ample sources

    Nevertheless, the situation may have opened up a more credible line of attack for the Kerry team.

    "There would seem to be ample grounds for Kerry to launch a major attack on the Bush administration based on ample sources, not from partisan

    sources," Rose said.

    Democrat Kerry has yet to fully
    capitalise on WMD revelations

    Kerry has struggled to capitalise politically on the Iraq issue, despite mounting US casualties and growing public concern that the administration does

    not have a successful exit strategy.

    In a recent poll by the Pew Research Center, Bush led Kerry 50% to 40% on the question of who would make better decisions in Iraq.

    "The war in Iraq remains a vulnerability for the president, but Kerry has yet to take advantage of it," a summary of the poll said.

    The Bush campaign has repeatedly portrayed Kerry as a "flip-flopper" on Iraq, making it more difficult for Kerry to focus public attention on the

    administration's perceived failures, according to Will Marshall, president of the Progressive Policy Institute, a centrist Democratic thinktank.

    Nuanced position

    "Kerry has got his own problems on Iraq and that is one reason he has not been able to close the gap with Bush," Marshall said. "Kerry's position is

    highly nuanced and difficult for some voters to grasp."

     

    With the US toll now at 1073, the
    Iraq war is a major election issue

    Furthermore, Republicans have traditionally held such a strong advantage on national-security issues that many voters are likely to give "the

    president the benefit of the doubt", Michael Pan, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a liberal policy group, said.

    Whether the Duelfer report will help Kerry blunt that advantage remains unclear, but some experts have their doubts.

    "It doesn't seem to me to add too much that's new," Marshall said.

    Bush, meanwhile, has characterised the report as a vindication of his administration's case for war.

    "Based on all the information we have today, I believe we were right to take action, and America is safer today with Saddam Hussein in prison," Bush

    said. "He retained the knowledge, the materials, the means, and the intent to produce weapons of mass destruction."

    SOURCE: Aljazeera


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why some African Americans are moving to Africa

    Escaping systemic racism: Why I quit New York for Accra

    African-Americans are returning to the lands of their ancestors as life becomes precarious and dangerous in the USA.

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    No country in the world recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

    North Korea's nuclear weapons: Here is what we know

    North Korea's nuclear weapons