Australia accused of lying about Iraq

A group of more than 40 former Australian diplomats and defence chiefs has accused Prime Minister John Howard's government of deceiving the Australian people about the reasons for invading Iraq.

    Australia maintains about 850 troops in Iraq

    The open letter on Sunday echoed similar statements issued earlier in the year by retired US and British officials, making Australia the latest of the pro-war allies to face criticism from its own former diplomats.

      

    The statement said the electorate had been misled over the reasons for joining the US-led invasion of Iraq, and democracy could not work properly if people could not trust their elected representatives.

      

    "We are concerned that Australia was committed to join the invasion of Iraq on the basis of false assumptions and deception of the Australian people," the statement said.

     

    Wrong reason

      

    "Saddam's dictatorial regime has ended but removing him was not the reason given to the Australian people for going to war.

     

    Howard denies misleading the
    public over Iraq

    "The prime minister said in March 2003 that our policy was the disarmament of Iraq not the removal of Saddam Hussein."

      

    It said Australia's involvement had raised the country's profile as a "terrorist target".

      

    The statement was signed by former defence force chiefs Alan Beaumont and Peter Gration, former defence department secretary Paul Barratt, former prime minister's department secretaries Alan Renouf and Richard Woolcott as well as former ambassadors, including Rawdon Dalrymple, Stephen Fitzgerald and Ross Garnaut.

     

    Strong supporter

      

    Australia has been one of the strongest supporters of the Iraq campaign, committing about 2000 troops to last year's invasion and maintaining about 850 troops in and around the country.

     

    "Australian leaders must produce more carefully balanced policies and present them in more sophisticated ways"

    Australian ex-diplomats
    and defence chiefs

    Howard has repeatedly denied misleading the public about the invasion, saying intelligence at the time indicated Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

     

    The signatories said they did not wish to endanger Australia's alliance with the US, but asserted that it should be a genuine partnership and not just a rubber stamp for policies decided in Washington.

      

    "Australian leaders must produce more carefully balanced policies and present them in more sophisticated ways," they wrote.

      

    In April, a group of former diplomats sent a letter to British Prime Minister Tony Blair savaging "doomed policies" in Iraq and the Middle East.

      

    The letter was echoed by retired US diplomatic and military officials in two separate letters in May and June accusing President George Bush of undermining US credibility in the Arab world and calling for him to be voted out over Iraq.

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    More than 300 people died in Somalia but some are asking why there was less news coverage and sympathy on social media.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Japan's third-largest steelmaker has admitted it faked data on parts used in cars, planes and trains.