Israel wants US veto on illegal wall

Israel has asked Washington to block any UN Security Council resolution that refers to the World Court's ruling on its illegal wall.

    At a cost of more than a $1m/km, the wall is 30% completed

    Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom told Israel Radio on Saturday that he had just spent a week in the US trying to stop the "all out party" by Palestinians looking for reaction to the court ruling at the Security Council.

    "I am therefore assuming ... that there is a good chance there will be a veto," he added.

    Shalom added he was sure the court's decision "will go to the Security Council because they [Palestinians] can muster an automatic majority in the UN General Assembly." 
       
    But only the 15-nation Security Council can take action on the ruling. Israel is expecting its US ally to veto any resolution. 
       
    Unacceptable

    Tel Aviv has said the ruling is invalid because it fails to address its alleged reason for building the barrier on occupied Palestinian land - its own security.

    However, three times as many Palestinians have been killed since the beginning of the al-Aqsa Intifada than Israelis.

    Palestinians call the barrier an "apartheid wall" that will deny them a viable state and has separated thousands of people from their fields, schools and hospitals.

    "I am therefore assuming ... that there
    is a good chance there will be a veto"


    Silvan Shalom,
    Israeli foreign minister commenting on UN vote

    Officials said they would demand the Security Council take action. 
        
    But US officials have already made clear they oppose UN involvement in resolving the issue.
       
    "We do not believe that that's the appropriate forum to resolve what is a political issue," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan, adding it should be tackled through an internationally-backed road map to peace.
       
    Illegal wall
       
    The World Court, the UN's highest tribunal, issued a non-binding ruling on Friday that the partially-built barrier erected on occupied Palestinian territory was unlawful.

    It said Israel must tear down the barrier and pay compensation to those who had lost their homes and land.
       
    "The wall ... cannot be justified by military exigencies or by the requirements of national security," its head, Judge Shi Jiuyong, said.
      
    But Israel has already vowed to keep building the 600km barrier, which is about one-third complete.

    Its route curves around illegal settlements deep inside the occupied West Bank. When contacted by Aljazeera.net, no Israeli official at the Ministry of the Interior would explain why Tel Aviv had not built the barrier on the Israeli side of the border.

    SOURCE: Aljazeera + Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why some African Americans are moving to Africa

    Escaping systemic racism: Why I quit New York for Accra

    African-Americans are returning to the lands of their ancestors as life becomes precarious and dangerous in the USA.

    What happens when the US government shuts down?

    The US government has shut down. What happens next?

    US federal government begins partial shutdown after Senate blocks short-term spending bill. What happens next?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Is an empowered Palestinian girl not worthy of Western feminist admiration?