Report: CIA kept Bush in dark over Iraq

The CIA failed to pass on to President George Bush before the Iraq invasion information that Baghdad had abandoned its programme to develop weapons of mass destruction, a US newspaper has reported.

    The US panel doubted the motives of the CIA

    The information to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) came from relatives of Iraqi scientists, the New York Times reported on its website late on Monday. 

      

    Citing unnamed government officials, the newspaper said the existence of a secret prewar CIA operation to debrief relatives of Iraqi scientists - and the agency's failure to give their statements to the president and other policymakers - has been

    uncovered by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

      

    The panel has been investigating the government's handling of prewar intelligence after US and British troops failed to uncover any alleged stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons the Bush administration used to justify the invasion.

     

    Scathing indictment

      

    The report, which is expected to be released this week, will likely contain a scathing indictment of the CIA and its leaders for failing to recognise that the evidence they had collected did not justify their assessment that Saddam Hussein had illicit weapons, the report said.

      

    CIA reports on alleged Iraqi
    WMDs were not accurate

    CIA officials played down the significance of the information, saying only a handful of relatives made claims that the weapons programmes were dead, according to The Times.

      

    The Senate report concludes that the agency and the rest of the intelligence community did a poor job of collecting information about the status of Iraq's weapons programmes.

     

    Analysts at the CIA and other intelligence agencies did an even worse job of

    writing reports that accurately reflected the information they had, the paper said.

     

    Misrepresentation

      

    The document cites instances in which analysts may have misrepresented information, writing reports that distorted evidence in order to bolster their case that Iraq did have chemical, biological and nuclear programmes, according to the report.

      

    The Senate found, for example, that an Iraqi defector who supposedly provided evidence of the existence of a biological weapons programme had actually said he did not know of any such thing, The Times said.

      

    On whether a shipment of aluminium tubes seized on its way to Iraq was evidence that Baghdad was trying to build a nuclear bomb, the Senate panel wondered whether the CIA had become an advocate, rather than an objective observer, as it selectively sought to prove that the tubes were for a nuclear weapons programme.

     

    But the committee has not found any evidence that the analysts changed their reports as a result of political pressure from the White House, according to The Times.

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Venezuela in default: What next?

    Venezuela in default: What next?

    As the oil-rich country fails to pay its debt, we examine what happens next and what it means for its people.

    The Muslims of South Korea

    The Muslims of South Korea

    The number of Muslims in South Korea is estimated to be around 100,000, including foreigners.

    What is Mohammed bin Salman's next move?

    What is Mohammed bin Salman's next move?

    There are reports Saudi Arabia is demanding money from the senior officials it recently arrested.