Legal hope for Guantanamo inmates

The US Supreme Court has ruled that "foreign terrorism" suspects at a US military base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba can use the American legal system to challenge their detention.

    About 595 foreign nationals are being held in Cuba

    By a 6-3 vote, the justices ruled on Monday that US courts do have jurisdiction to consider the claims of the prisoners who say in their lawsuits they are being held illegally in violation of their rights. 

    The ruling did not address the merits of the claims, but allowed the prisoners to pursue their lawsuits, which lower courts had dismissed. 

    Justice John Paul Stevens said for the majority that US courts have jurisdiction to consider challenges to the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in connection with hostilities and incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay. 

    The justices overturned a US court appeal ruling that lawsuits should be dismissed on the grounds that the military base was outside US sovereign territory and that rights of habeas corpus were unavailable to foreign nationals outside US territory. 

    Legal status

    Bush's policies have been attacked by civil liberties and human rights groups, especially after the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal and questions on whether the US government has sought to condone torture during interrogations of terror suspects. 

    George Bush's policies have been
    attacked by human rights groups

    About 595 foreign nationals, designated "enemy combatants," are being held at the base in Cuba as suspected al-Qaida members or Taliban fighters. 

    Most of those at Guantanamo were seized during the US-led campaign against the Taliban government in Afghanistan and against Usama bin Ladin's al-Qaida network after the 11 September 2001, attacks on the United States. The first detainees arrived in January 2002. 

    All but a handful of those at the base are being held without being charged, without access to lawyers or their families and without access to courts or a proceeding of any kind. 

    SOURCE: Reuters


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    More than 300 people died in Somalia but some are asking why there was less news coverage and sympathy on social media.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Japan's third-largest steelmaker has admitted it faked data on parts used in cars, planes and trains.