Gaza pullout vote hangs in the balance

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Gaza withdrawal plan is facing the possibility of rejection by his own party as Likud members vote on the proposal.

    Sharon's plan is facing the possibility of rejection

    Polls published on Sunday just before the referendum reaffirmed previous surveys indicating a majority opposed his move to evacuate all Jewish settlers in Gaza and a few in the West Bank. 

    His plan also entails holding onto larger West Bank settlement blocs containing the majority of Jews on territory Israel occupied in the 1967 Middle East war. 

    Likud has traditionally opposed giving up any land captured in war with Arabs and the settlers lobbied hard against the "Disengagement Plan", staking out Israeli intersections, hoisting anti-withdrawal signs and meeting Likud members. 

    'Rewarding terror'

    Sharon, long the godfather of the settlement movement, says
    his plan would reduce Israelis' exposure to "Palestinian violence" while retaining territory deemed strategically vital. 

    Nationwide opinion polls indicate a majority of Israelis support
    withdrawal from Gaza. But Sharon's Likud opponents and far-right coalition partners say that leaving Gaza would "reward terror". 

    That argument resonated among those Israelis who believe a
    unilateral pullout in 2000 from Lebanon, where troops were under constant resistance attack, encouraged Palestinians to begin their uprising later that year. 

    Sharon's aides made clear that even if he lost Sunday's vote, he would present his plan to his cabinet and to parliament, where the chances of approval are higher. In the event of defeat, Sharon could also call a national referendum. 
     
    Urging 'yes vote'

    Defence Minister Shaul Mofaz urged the Likud to accept the
    plan. He said on Israel Radio that it was "good for Israel" and
    could be carried out by the end of 2005. 

    Shaul Mofaz is urging the Likud
    to accept the Gaza pullout

    "The proposal should win a majority and be implemented as quickly as possible because no matter what, we will implement this plan whether it is approved today or in the future," Mofaz said on Israel Army Radio. 

    Sharon tried to rally support by warning the right-wing party that voting down the proposal could jeopardise Israel's vital ties with the United States, weaken the party's grip on
    power and force new elections. 

    Failing to sway Likud's rank-and-file would deal a strong blow to Sharon, already embroiled in a corruption scandal that threatens to topple him. Israel's attorney general is to decide soon whether to indict Sharon, who denies any wrongdoing. 

    But the 76-year-old former general, prime minister since
    2001, stopped short of threatening to resign in a series of
    last-ditch appeals on television to Likud's 193,000 members to
    show their confidence in him and back the proposal. 

    Opposition

    Polls published on Sunday, however, continued to reflect majority opposition to his plan. 

    "The proposal should win a majority and be implemented as quickly as possible because no matter what, we will implement this plan whether it is approved today or in the future"

    Shaul Mofaz,

    Defence Minister

    One survey found 47.5% against the pullout and 44% in favour, while a second predicted 49% would vote it down and only 41% would approve it. 

    About 7500 Israelis live in the Gaza Strip, home to 1.3 million Palestinians. There are 200,000 settlers in the West Bank, which has a Palestinian population of 2.3 million. 

    Under Sharon's scheme, Israel would abandon all 21 small settlements in Gaza and four of the 120 it put in the West Bank. 

    He said the pullout would improve Israel's security and
    pledged to retain control for ever over larger West Bank
    settlements, a move Palestinians regard as a land grab. 

    Voting at 168 polling stations started at 8am (05:00 GMT)
    and is to continue until 10pm (19:00 GMT), with initial
    results expected to be released around midnight. 

    SOURCE: Reuters


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    More than 300 people died in Somalia but some are asking why there was less news coverage and sympathy on social media.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Japan's third-largest steelmaker has admitted it faked data on parts used in cars, planes and trains.