[QODLink]
Archive
UNHCHR criticised for political inertia
Diplomats and activists have criticised the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights, saying the institution enables human suffering to go on unchecked.
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2004 09:27 GMT
UNHCHR: An institution to end rights abuses or not?
Diplomats and activists have criticised the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights, saying the institution enables human suffering to go on unchecked.

Speaking to journalists on Sunday, Human Rights Watch's Lubna Fraih said the UNHCHR was at best a political beast made up of 53 member states with individual agendas that trade votes for good political relations.

"The problem is that it is down to political games and political trickery, vote swapping and horse trading about different issues."
  
Chitsaka Chipaziwa, Zimbabwe's ambassador to the UN, said the lack of a resolution on Iraq was a clear example of the selectivity and double standards in favour of western countries that had become enshrined in the commission.
  
"We felt it odd, many of us, that when over 600 civilians are killed in a matter of days in Falluja nobody discusses that. 
  
"What kind of human rights are we talking about if we cannot address the fundamental human right, which is the right to life itself?" he asked.
  
Commission response

Mary Whelan, Ireland's ambassador who is acting on behalf of the European Union at the commission, said Brussels proposed for discussion what it considered to be priority cases - such as a resolution on North Korea - at the forum. 
  

"The best way for countries to avoid a resolution against them is to become a commission member"

Adrien-Claude Zoller,
president of Geneva for
Human Rights

"Those who make that argument [for a resolution on Iraq], they should act on that argument," she said.
  
The commission, which is due to wrap-up its annual six-week session on 23 April, is widely seen as a place where member states such as China, Russia and the United States use their political influence on other parties to avoid condemnation of their human rights record.
  
Chamber of impunity?

Seated in circular rows with commission chairman Mike Smith at the head under a giant projector screen, states vote electronically on various issues from the country resolutions to broader measures on economic and social rights.
  
Each nation's vote is displayed on the screen with the total yes, no or abstention tally at the bottom, facilitating block votes that protect the big players from inspection, critics said. 

"The best way for countries to avoid a resolution against them is to become a commission member so they can decide on themselves," said Adrien-Claude Zoller, president of the non-governmental organisation Geneva for Human Rights.
  
"The commission on human rights has become a chamber of impunity."

Source:
Reuters
Topics in this article
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
Muslim volunteers face questioning and threat of arrest, while aid has been disrupted or blocked, charities say.
Six months on, outrage and sorrow over the mass schoolgirl abduction has disappeared - except for families in Nigeria.
ISIL combatants seeking an 'exit strategy' from Mideast conflict need positive reinforcement back home, analysts say.
European nation hit by a wave of Islamophobia as many young fighters join ISIL in Syria and Iraq.
Featured
Lack of child protection laws means abandoned and orphaned kids rely heavily on the care of strangers.
At least 25 tax collectors have been killed since 2012 in Mogadishu, a city awash in weapons and abject poverty.
Since she was 16-years-old, Scottish Nationalist Party's Sturgeon has strove for independence from the UK.
Armed group's ransom success with German hostages marks a re-emergence, as authorities investigate ISIL links.
Western nations are moving into the resource-rich country after decades of disinterest, challenging China's interests.