UN to rule on cloning ban treaty

The General Assembly is due to decide on Monday whether to go ahead or to delay drafting a treaty banning all forms of human cloning including research involving the cloning of human cells.

    The horse clone, Prometea (L), was born in May 2003

    Strongly backed by the US anti-abortion movement and many predominantly Catholic nations, the campaign at the United Nations for a broad cloning ban has been led by the Bush administration and Costa Rica.
    Opponents of a broad ban want a narrower approach prohibiting only the cloning of a human being, an idea that has virtually universal support among the General Assembly's 191 member nations.

    But supporters of a broad global treaty rule out the option of a narrow approach, portraying so-called therapeutic cloning - in which cells from cloned human embryos are used in medical research - as the taking of human lives.
    In a setback for the White House, the assembly's legal committee decided by a one-vote margin last month to recommend that the writing of an international treaty banning cloning be put off for two years.

    Overturn attempts

    The legal panel's recommendation now comes up in the full General Assembly, whose membership is identical to that of the legal committee. But Costa Rica said last week it would try to overturn the panel's vote.
    Backers of the delay argued there should be a broad global consensus on the treaty's goals before work begins. 

    But the US maintains its supportive position of a total ban on human cloning, Richard Grenell, the spokesman for US Ambassador John Negroponte, told

    Negroponte stands for American  
    support of total ban on cloning

    Reuters news agency.
    "If the Costa Rican proposal comes up, we will vote for it," Grenell said.
    Supporters of a narrow human cloning ban, however, predicted the Costa Rica group would not gather the number of votes needed to prevail in the full General Assembly.

    Scientific interest

    The scientific community is lobbying UN missions to preserve the right to pursue therapeutic cloning, saying banning it would threaten a potentially promising field of research.
    While most scientists strongly oppose the cloning of a human being, "we must not allow those concerns to block medical advances that may some day be achieved through other kinds of research that involve cloned cells," said Alan Leshner, head of the Washington-based American Association for the Advancement of Science.
    The broad approach backed by the United States and Costa Rica would ban "efforts to use cloned embryonic stem cells to try and generate healthy tissues, or to treat degenerative
    diseases such as Parkinson's," he said.

    SOURCE: Reuters


    John Pilger Q&A: 'US missiles are pointed at China'

    John Pilger Q&A: 'US missiles are pointed at China'

    Journalist John Pilger thinks the US and China might be on the path to war. "My film is a warning," he says.

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    No country in the world recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

    Sadly but frankly, Donald Trump is not going anywhere

    Sadly but frankly, Donald Trump is not going anywhere

    Trump isn't going to be impeached by this or perhaps any future Congress as currently constituted.