White House slams Guantanamo ruling

The White House has said that an appeals court decision granting detainees in Guantanamo the right to a lawyer runs counter to 50 years of US law.

    A US appeals court has criticised detentions without charge

    "Our position - based on long-standing Supreme Court precedent - is that US courts have no jurisdiction over non-US citizens being held in military custody abroad," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said.

      

    "There is 50-year-old-Supreme Court precedent in the case of Germans, prisoners of war, held in China," he said, adding that it held that US courts had no jurisdiction in

    that matter.

     

    The San Francisco-based appeals court issued its ruling on Thursday in a case filed by Belaid Gherebi on behalf of his brother, Faren, a Libyan who is being held without charge at Guantanamo along with hundreds of other men captured in the US "war on terror".

     

    Critical

     

    The court was harshly critical of the detention of the prisoners at Guantanamo without charge or the protections of the Geneva Convention.

      

    "Let's keep in mind that we are talking about enemy combatants who were involved in harming American citizens," McClellan said.

     

    "Let's keep in mind that we are talking about enemy combatants who were involved in harming American citizens"

    Scott McClellan,
    spokesman, White House

    The more than 650 Guantanamo inmates have not been charged with any crime. A few have been released over the past year.

      

    The 2-1 ruling delivered by the San Francisco-based US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit was the second blow delivered on Thursday to legal manoeuvres by the administration of President George Bush in its "war on terror".

      

    Earlier in the day, a federal appeals court in New York ruled that Bush did not have the right to detain Jose Padilla, a US citizen seized on US soil, as an "enemy combatant" and ordered his release within 30 days.

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    John Pilger Q&A: 'US missiles are pointed at China'

    John Pilger Q&A: 'US missiles are pointed at China'

    Journalist John Pilger thinks the US and China might be on the path to war. "My film is a warning," he says.

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    No country in the world recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

    Sadly but frankly, Donald Trump is not going anywhere

    Sadly but frankly, Donald Trump is not going anywhere

    Trump isn't going to be impeached by this or perhaps any future Congress as currently constituted.