US bans patenting of humans

US lawmakers have decided the country’s Patent Office will be barred from issuing patents on human organisms, such as genetically engineered embryos.

    Legislation will not affect patents on genes, cells and tissue

    Representative Dave Weldon, a medical doctor who sponsored the provision to be included in a giant spending bill, said on Monday it would codify existing Patent Office rules that human organisms are not patentable subject matter.
     
    An agreement was worked out with senators to make clear, in a report accompanying the provision, that the patent ban would not interfere with stem cell research, said Weldon.
      
    The provision would ban patents for genetically engineered human embryos, foetuses and human beings. It would not affect patents on genes, cells, tissue and other biological products.

    It would also not stop scientists from seeking patents for the procedures or methods of creating a biological product.

    Human embryonic stem cells
    illuminated by proteins

    US Patent and Trademark Office director James Rogan, in a letter last week to Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Ted Steve, said his office viewed the Weldon amendment as “fully consistent with USPTO's policy on the non-patentability

    of human life-forms”.  

    Weldon said in a recent floor speech that his amendment would leave the Patent Office free to address new or borderline issues.

    As an example, he noted that the Patent Office does grant patents in cases where an animal has been modified to include a few human genes so it can produce a human protein or antibody.
      
    Concerns

    The Biotechnology Industry Organisation has voiced concerns about the amendment, saying the language is vague and would jeopardise many human-derived biotechnology inventions.

    It warned that investors, fearing a lack of patent protection, would not invest when there is no clear definition of what encompasses a human organism.
      
    “The biotechnology industry has been fighting this tooth and nail,”  said Weldon.
     
    The amendment last July was attached to the House version of a 2004 spending bill for the departments of Commerce, Justice and State. The bill is included in a package of unfinished spending bills that Congress is expected to approve and send to the president next week.

    SOURCE: Unspecified


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why some African Americans are moving to Africa

    Escaping systemic racism: Why I quit New York for Accra

    African-Americans are returning to the lands of their ancestors as life becomes precarious and dangerous in the USA.

    What happens when the US government shuts down?

    The US government has shut down. What happens next?

    US federal government begins partial shutdown after Senate blocks short-term spending bill. What happens next?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Is an empowered Palestinian girl not worthy of Western feminist admiration?