Retrial for Gujarat riots accused

The Indian state of Gujarat has agreed to seek a fresh trial for 20 men acquitted of involvement in last year's religious riots.

    Tardy trials have led to calls for the Gujarat government's resignation

    The capitulation came after the country's highest court last week slammed the provincial government for its failure to punish those involved in the Hindu-Muslim riots, after a local court exonerated 20 men, charged with killing 12 Muslims, for lack of evidence.

    P.N.Lahiri, Gujarat's most senior bureaucrat informed the Supreme Court on Friday that the provincial government would amend its appeal against the acquittal of the 20 men and also seek their retrial. 

    Censure

    In a stinging indictment last week, Supreme Court Chief Justice V.N.Khare had termed the state government's earlier appeal an "eyewash" and called on the the government to quit if it could not punish the culprits.

    Gujarat is ruled by Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee's nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party.

    The Supreme Court's strictures followed an appeal by the independent National Human Rights Commission and a witness seeking a fresh trial in the case.

    The killing of the 12 men in the city of Baroda was one of the most barbaric incidents during the riots which swept the state after 59 Hindu pilgrims were torched alive inside a train by a Muslim mob.

    The riots left at least 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, dead.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why some African Americans are moving to Africa

    Escaping systemic racism: Why I quit New York for Accra

    African-Americans are returning to the lands of their ancestors as life becomes precarious and dangerous in the USA.

    What happens when the US government shuts down?

    The US government has shut down. What happens next?

    US federal government begins partial shutdown after Senate blocks short-term spending bill. What happens next?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Is an empowered Palestinian girl not worthy of Western feminist admiration?