[QODLink]
Archive
Barzani meets Shia leaders ahead of US talks
Kurdish leader Masoud Barzani travelled to the Iraqi city of Najaf on Thursday to confer with senior Shia Muslim leaders before meeting with the United States occupation administration to discuss the country's future next Friday.
Last Modified: 05 Jun 2003 10:59 GMT
Kurdish leader Masoud Barzani travelled to the Iraqi city of Najaf on Thursday to confer with senior Shia Muslim leaders before meeting with the United States occupation administration to discuss the country's future next Friday.

Barzani: No justification for US
presence after establishment of
interim government

Speaking to reporters as he left Baghdad on his first visit to Najaf since 1967, Barzani said: "It's important to exchange views with my brothers in Najaf.” 

The leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) said he would meet Najaf's top Shia clerics - Ayatollah Muhammad Bakr al-Hakim, leader of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and Grand Ayatollah Ali Muhammad al-Sistani.
   
SCIRI and Barzani's KDP have both opposed leading US occupation administrator Paul Bremer's plan to name a 25 to 30-member interim political council, rather than have such a body elected by a national conference as proposed at earlier pre-war conferences in London and Salah ud-Din.
       
Sistani, who stayed in Najaf during President Saddam's presidency, is believed to wield significant influence over Shias who make up about 60 percent of Iraq's 26 million people.

Further meetings

The Najaf talks precede Barzani’s meeting with Bremer in Baghdad on Friday, to be attended by seven other Iraqi political groups as well.

The meeting will discuss the controversial US-British plans to create an interim Iraqi administration. 
    
The naming of the 25 to 30 member interim council, a post-occupation plan and not something publicized before the war,  is a point for significant change.

Barzani has repeatedly stated his belief that there is be "no justification" for US forces to remain in Iraq once an interim Iraqi government has taken over ahead of general elections.

Bremer's Iraq: Different from
what was agreed before invasion

Barzani highlighted last month that Kurds, an estimated 20 percent of the population, were not seeking an independent state in northern Iraq for the time being.

"Our agenda at the moment is for an Iraq that is parliamentary, pluralistic, democratic and federal," he said.

Change of agenda

Before the invasion, there was an agreement with the US that Iraqis would be "their own masters" and pick their own interim government, said Barzani, whose fighters aligned themselves with the US-led invasion forces.
 
"We are pursuing the agenda hammered out at the London conference [of major opposition groups in December] and the Salah ud-Din conference" in February, he said last month, referring to the opposition's endorsement of a federal democratic system.

Asked whether the Kurds were in fact "pitching their tent wherever they reach" and would eventually demand statehood, Barzani said: "Like all other nations, the Kurdish nation is fully entitled to self-determination and the establishment of a Kurdish state.”

Topics in this article
People
Country
City
Featured on Al Jazeera
More than one-quarter of Gaza's population has been displaced, causing a humanitarian crisis.
Ministers and MPs caught on camera sleeping through important speeches have sparked criticism that they are not working.
Muslim charities claim discrimination after major UK banks began closing their accounts.
Italy struggles to deal with growing flood of migrants willing to risk their lives to reach the nearest European shores.
Featured
Frustration grows in Kiev as pledges to end corruption and abuse of power stagnate after Maidan Square protest.
Thousands of Houthi supporters have called for the fall of Yemen's government. But what do the Houthis really want?
New ration reductions and movement restrictions have refugees from Myanmar anxious about their future in Thailand.
US lawyers say poor translations of election materials disenfranchise Native voters.
US drones in Pakistan have killed thousands since 2004. How have leaders defended or decried these deadly planes?
join our mailing list